Home > List of Issue > Table of Contents > Abstract

Journal of Nippon Medical School

Full Text of this Article

-Original-

Effectiveness of Changing the Class of Molecularly Targeted Agent after Disease Progression during Initial Molecularly Targeted Therapy for Luminal Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

Satoko Nakano1, Akemi Mibu1, Shunsuke Kato1,2, Shigeo Yamaguchi1,3, Yuna Suzuki1,4, Kaoru Tanimura1,4 and Masataka Sano5

1Department of Breast Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
2Medical Oncology Department, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
3Surgical Department, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
4Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
5Faculty of Commerce, Takushoku University, Tokyo, Japan


Background: The emergence of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) has altered the treatment landscape for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC)/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Multiple guidelines recommend molecularly targeted therapy as first-line treatment for HR+/HER2− ABC/MBC. However, optimal treatment for disease progression during MTA therapy remains undetermined. This study evaluated the suitability of different MTA types for this patient subgroup.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic health records of 56 patients with HR+/HER2− ABC/MBC receiving treatment with palbociclib, abemaciclib, or everolimus in our center between April 2014 and June 2021.
Results: Overall, 39, 14, and 35 regimens using palbociclib, abemaciclib, and everolimus, respectively, were identified. Three and 53 patients were premenopausal and postmenopausal, respectively. MTAs were included in the 1st-11th lines of treatment. Time to failure (TTF) was significantly different among the three MTAs. In contrast, TTF did not significantly differ among the 50 regimens that included CDK4/6 inhibitors, with/without prior mTOR inhibitor use, and the 35 regimens that included mTOR inhibitors, with/without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use.
Conclusions: The sequential use of different MTA classes did not affect the TTF of another MTA. mTOR inhibitor + exemestane is a favorable treatment option after CDK4/6 inhibitor + hormone therapy, and CDK4/6 inhibitor + hormone therapy is suitable for patients previously treated with mTOR inhibitor + exemestane. Although this study was retrospective and conducted at a single center, the present findings are useful for treatment selection in clinical practice.

J Nippon Med Sch 2023; 90: 179-185

Keywords
breast cancer, cyclin-dependent kinase, drug resistance, mammalian target of rapamycin, molecularly targeted therapy

Correspondence to
Satoko Nakano, MD, PhD, Department of Breast Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, 180 Nishi-Araijuku, Kawaguchi, Saitama 333-0833, Japan
s.nakano@kawaguchi-mmc.org

Received, June 21, 2022
Accepted, December 2, 2022